How Clean Is Clean?

Economic Concepts Environmental Context
Marginal analysis Pollution clean-up
Opportunity Cost
Sunk cost
Marginal Cost and Benefit
Total Cost and Benefit

National Content Standards Addressed:

Standard 2: Effective decision making requires comparing the additional costs of alternatives with the additional benefits. Most choices involve doing a little more or a little less of something; few choices are all-or-nothing decisions.

Standard 4: People respond predictably to positive and negative incentives.

Standard 5: Voluntary exchange occurs only when all participating parties expect to gain.

Key Points

  1. Review: There are no costless choices.
    • Because of scarcity, choosing one alternative means giving up the next best alternative.
    • A decision to use the environment in one way means giving up the benefits of the next-best alternative use.
      • Comparing these provides the opportunity to make better choices.
  2. Economics teaches us that the relevant costs and benefits in decision-making are marginal costs and benefits.
    • Marginal = additional or the next.
      • Marginal cost is the additional cost or the cost of the next unit of production
      • Marginal benefit is the additional benefit or the benefit of the next unit of production
    • Illustrations from everyday life:
      • Cleaning up a teenager’s room
      • Preparing for visitors in your home – which room do you clean first?
  3. Economic reasoning teaches us that the economic perspective, which emphasizes marginal cost/marginal benefit analysis, is preferable to the all-or-nothing approach to pollution clean-up sometimes adopted by environmental activist groups.
    • Pollution issues are marginal (clean enough) problems rather than all-or-nothing (pristine) problems, for they concentrate on the trade-offs involved in continuing clean-up or diverting resources to another environmental effort.
    • Because they include sunk costs, total cost and average total cost offer no guidance in decisions about future actions.
  4. Economic reasoning approaches the issue of pollution clean as a marginal analysis problem.
    • The relevant comparison is between expected marginal social benefits and expected marginal social costs of clean up.
    • Graphic representation of a pollution clean-up situation:
      • Marginal social cost curve – note that cost increases
      • Marginal social benefit curve – note that benefits increase
      • Point of maximum benefit is where MSB = MSC (or where 2 social cost curves intersect).
      • Activity: Is 100% Clean Really Worth It? (ppt)

  5. Conclusion: In decisions about future actions, the relevant costs and benefits are marginal.
    • Production examples: Light bulb puzzle – average total cost and sunk cost provide misleading information in deciding whether or not to continue a course of action.
    • Example: The Audubon Society and oil drilling on the Paul J. Rainey Sanctuary

Debbie Henney, FTE Director of Curriculum Receives Bessie B Moore Service Award

  Foundation for Teaching Economics is proud to announce that Debbie Henney, director of curriculum for the Foundation for Teaching…

FTE Pays Tribute to Jerry Hume

It is with deep sadness that we announce the loss of William J. Hume, known as Jerry Hume, former Chairman…

Why We Should Be Teaching Students Economic Literacy

Ted Tucker, Executive Director, Foundation for Teaching Economics October 26, 2022 More high schools are offering courses on personal finance…